← All agents

Underwriting

Atlas

Straight-through on the clean cases, evidence on the rest

Atlas assembles the underwriting file, applies your manual rather than a generic model, and books a decision where the case is unambiguous — routing everything else to an underwriter with the reasoning already written.

62%
Cases decided straight-through
4 min
File assembly, from days
±0
Manual rules overridden silently
100%
Decisions with an evidence trail

Interactive demo

Watch Atlas work a real case.

Step through it one action at a time. Nothing here is a mock-up of a chat window — these are the actual stages of a run, including the checks that happen before anything visible occurs.

Underwriting workbench0/7 steps

A $750K term application with an Rx history the e-app didn't mention

A 44-year-old applicant, $750K 20-year term, e-app declares no medications and no treatment in five years. Paramed and Rx data arrive over the following 36 hours.

Full transcript & decision trace

The part most vendors don't show you.

The verbatim conversation plus the reasoning trace behind it: rules fired, thresholds crossed, costs incurred, and every decision the agent deliberately refused to make.

Unlock the trace

Enter your details and it opens on this page. No spam — we only write when we have something worth saying.

What it's for

The problems Atlas exists to solve.

01

File assembly is the bottleneck, not judgment

Underwriters spend most of a case reading and reconciling documents. The actual decision takes minutes.

02

Clean cases wait behind hard ones

A case that should be an instant approval sits in the same queue as a complex impaired-risk file.

03

Consistency drifts

Two underwriters, same file, different class. Without a trace, the variance is invisible until an audit finds it.

Capabilities

What it actually does.

Multi-source file assembly

MIB, Rx history, e-app, APS, labs, and motor vehicle records reconciled into one structured file with conflicts flagged.

Manual-grounded scoring

Runs your underwriting manual as explicit rules — not a black-box score — so every debit and credit is attributable.

Conflict and omission detection

Flags where the application contradicts Rx or MIB data, the single highest-value signal in the file.

Straight-through booking

Books the decision in policy admin where the case is clean and inside the automatic threshold.

Underwriter briefing

Complex cases arrive with the file summarized, the ambiguity named, and the relevant manual section cited.

Integrations
  • MIB
  • Rx / pharmacy databases
  • Lab vendors
  • APS retrieval
  • Policy admin
  • Underwriting workbench
Guardrails
  • Declines are never automated — every adverse decision goes to a human underwriter.
  • Any application/data conflict removes the case from the straight-through path.
  • Manual section cited for every debit; unattributable adjustments are blocked.
  • Protected-class proxies excluded from scoring and monitored by Sentry.

Human handoff: Anything outside the automatic band, any conflict, and every adverse action routes to a named underwriter with the file pre-read.

Questions

Straight answers.

Can Atlas decline an application?

No. Adverse decisions are human-only. Atlas prepares the file and quantifies the impact; an underwriter decides.

Whose underwriting manual does it use?

Yours. Atlas runs your manual as explicit, citable rules — that's why every debit points at a section number.

How do you prevent proxy discrimination?

Protected-class proxies are excluded from the feature set and Sentry monitors decision distributions for drift.

Related solution

Underwriting Automation

Explore the solution

Run Atlas against your own workflow.

Bring us one process and a number attached to it. We'll tell you whether an agent moves it.