← All agents

Resolution

Vesta

Deflection ends the contact. Vesta ends the problem.

Vesta classifies the real problem, assembles the account state, and actually changes the record — refunds, credits, address and entitlement fixes — then verifies the customer does not come back for the same reason.

58%
Cases closed without a human
-31%
Repeat contact on closed cases
100%
Interactions reviewed, not sampled
3 chan.
Chat, email, and voice on one case

Interactive demo

Watch Vesta work a real case.

Step through it one action at a time. Nothing here is a mock-up of a chat window — these are the actual stages of a run, including the checks that happen before anything visible occurs.

Chat → email → voice, one case0/7 steps

A three-channel billing dispute that had already been 'resolved' twice

A customer was double-charged after a plan change. They chatted on Tuesday (closed as resolved), emailed Thursday (auto-acknowledged), and are now calling. Three case IDs, one problem, no refund issued.

Full transcript & decision trace

The part most vendors don't show you.

The verbatim conversation plus the reasoning trace behind it: rules fired, thresholds crossed, costs incurred, and every decision the agent deliberately refused to make.

Unlock the trace

Enter your details and it opens on this page. No spam — we only write when we have something worth saying.

What it's for

The problems Vesta exists to solve.

01

Containment is scored as success

A contact that ends without resolution reappears in a different channel three days later — and the deflection dashboard counts both as wins.

02

The customer repeats themselves at every hop

Case context is fragmented across channels, so each transfer restarts the story and lengthens the handle time it was meant to shorten.

03

Tier-one agents cannot change anything

Read-only assistants generate a second queue. Resolution requires write access to the system of record with authority limits attached.

Capabilities

What it actually does.

Intent plus account state

Classifies the problem against entitlement, order and billing state, and prior contact history — not intent labels alone.

Write access with limits

Issues credits, reships, updates entitlements, and changes billing dates inside explicit per-action ceilings.

Cross-channel case identity

Chat, email, and voice on the same issue collapse into one case with one timeline.

Commitment tracking

Any promise made to a customer becomes a tracked object with an owner and a due date.

Defect mining

Reviews every interaction for policy exceptions, broken promises, and recurring confusion, producing a defect register for operations.

Integrations
  • Zendesk / Salesforce Service Cloud
  • Order & billing systems
  • Telephony / CCaaS
  • Knowledge base
  • Orion (voice)
Guardrails
  • Hard per-action credit and refund ceilings; anything above routes to a supervisor with the recommendation attached.
  • No account closure, no contract cancellation, no legal or complaint handling.
  • Vulnerability, distress, and regulatory-complaint language suppress automation and escalate immediately.
  • Every state change writes an audit record with the rule that authorized it.

Human handoff: Escalates with the full case file assembled — history, entitlement, commitments, and a recommended remedy — so the human starts at the decision instead of the discovery.

Questions

Straight answers.

Is this a chatbot?

No. A chatbot answers; Vesta changes state in the system of record inside explicit authority limits, then verifies the issue does not return.

What can't it do?

Cancellations, contract renegotiation, complaint handling, and anything above its refund ceiling. Those escalate with the file assembled.

How is success measured?

Cost per resolved issue including downstream contact within 30 days — not deflection, containment, or handle time.

Related solution

Policy Servicing

Explore the solution

Run Vesta against your own workflow.

Bring us one process and a number attached to it. We'll tell you whether an agent moves it.